Click on image to enlarge
KENNEBEC REPORTER.
GARDINER , ME.., SATURDAY AUGUST 26 , 1876.
The head of an Indian sent to the United States Secretary of the Interior.
A MATTER OF TASTE.
…We do not suppose that Mr. David Campbell hurt Grey Eagle very much when he scalped him. Neither is
bottling of a dead Indian’s head in alcohol , and sending it to the Secretary of the Interior by Adams Express ,
quite so distasteful as the practice which prevailed in England within the memory of our great grandfathers ,
of exposing public places the heads of great criminals who had suffered the last penalty of the law. Nor do
we forget that the very disagreeable usage of hanging in chains was not abolished in England till 1834. But
we of the United States have made a superior pretensions to all the rest of the world about the amelioration
of barbarism , of war , and of criminal law. Our State constitutions prohibit the infliction of cruel punishments.
Our diplomatic history shows that we have advocated almost every limitation of the liberty of belligerents
which has been adopted with a century into the international code. … We submit that it is not becoming for a
nation which makes these pretensions to tolerate the taking of scalps or the bottling of Indian’s heads by
men in its employment - as a matter of taste , in respect to which a violation of the proprieties is likely to
encourage the offender to deeds of substantial cruelty.
GARDINER , ME.., SATURDAY AUGUST 26 , 1876.
The head of an Indian sent to the United States Secretary of the Interior.
A MATTER OF TASTE.
…We do not suppose that Mr. David Campbell hurt Grey Eagle very much when he scalped him. Neither is
bottling of a dead Indian’s head in alcohol , and sending it to the Secretary of the Interior by Adams Express ,
quite so distasteful as the practice which prevailed in England within the memory of our great grandfathers ,
of exposing public places the heads of great criminals who had suffered the last penalty of the law. Nor do
we forget that the very disagreeable usage of hanging in chains was not abolished in England till 1834. But
we of the United States have made a superior pretensions to all the rest of the world about the amelioration
of barbarism , of war , and of criminal law. Our State constitutions prohibit the infliction of cruel punishments.
Our diplomatic history shows that we have advocated almost every limitation of the liberty of belligerents
which has been adopted with a century into the international code. … We submit that it is not becoming for a
nation which makes these pretensions to tolerate the taking of scalps or the bottling of Indian’s heads by
men in its employment - as a matter of taste , in respect to which a violation of the proprieties is likely to
encourage the offender to deeds of substantial cruelty.